Concerns Raised Over Constitutionality of New Mobility Subsidy in Madeira

In a significant political development, presidential candidate Gouveia e Melo has publicly questioned the constitutional validity of a recently promulgated decree-law concerning mobility subsidies in the Azores and Madeira. This decree-law, which aims to establish new rules for allocating social mobility subsidies, has been met with skepticism, even after being signed by the President of the Republic.

Gouveia e Melo expressed his concerns about the decree-law, highlighting that it might contradict Article 13 of the Portuguese Constitution. This article enshrines the principle of equality, stating that all citizens are equal before the law throughout the national territory. According to Gouveia e Melo, the decree-law imposes restrictions on transportation passes for individuals with debts, a measure that he argues is not applied in the rest of the country.

The core issue, as articulated by Gouveia e Melo, revolves around the concept of territorial continuity and the need to perceive the national territory as a cohesive whole. He insists that such legal frameworks should not create disparities among different regions, particularly in vital sectors like transportation.

This development is of particular interest to residents of Madeira and the Azores, as it directly affects their access to subsidized transportation, which is a critical aspect of daily life on the islands. The outcome of this debate may have lasting implications for how mobility subsidies are structured and allocated in these regions.

As this story unfolds, it highlights the delicate balance between regional autonomy and national unity, especially in areas with unique geographical challenges like Madeira. The discussion also underscores the importance of ensuring that legislative measures align with constitutional principles to maintain fairness and equality across all regions of Portugal.

dnoticias.pt

dnoticias.pt